Teaching students to read for meaning: A persuasive case for a different approach

Reading, thinking, & explaining

Haga clic aquí para la traducción al español (Google Translate)

Introduction

In contemporary language education, students are often trained to read texts strategically & selectively, primarily for the purpose of assessment. Whether the intention is to pass comprehension tests or succeed in high-stakes international examinations such as the Cambridge English suite, IELTS, Trinity, TOEFL, or TOEIC, reading instruction is typically geared toward rapid identification of answers. While these techniques may yield short-term gains in test performance, they often come at a significant cost: students fail to engage with texts in a meaningful way. This article advocates for a different approach toward teaching students to read for meaning, which supports deeper language processing, more robust comprehension skills, & more durable connections between form & meaning.

The problem with test-oriented reading

Too often, students emerge from reading tasks unable to articulate what the text was actually about. They may succeed in locating correct answers or matching phrases, but their understanding remains superficial. In such cases, they have not processed the ideas or integrated the information presented. In essence, they have not read for meaning.

This phenomenon is not merely anecdotal. Many language learners are trained, or train themselves, to search for keywords & specific information, & rely on test-taking heuristics. This behaviour is understandable within an test-driven system, but it leads to a fragmented, non-cohesive processing of texts. More importantly, it impedes long-term language development by failing to connect the language with the meaningful content it conveys. Students learn how to get through texts, but not how to get anything out of them.

Why reading for meaning matters

Reading for meaning involves slowing down, thinking critically, & engaging with texts on a conceptual level. This is not only essential for deeper comprehension but also aligns with what cognitive science has long confirmed about how proficient readers read in their first languages. Rather than focusing on surface features, proficient readers generate explanations, form inferences, & connect ideas. In cognitive terms, this constitutes generative learning, a process shown to substantially enhance understanding & retention (Fiorella & Mayer, 2020).

This approach does more than just enhance reading skills; it transforms how students interact with language, making connections between words, phrases, patterns, & meanings more robust & memorable. When students learn to read for meaning, they are better equipped to develop a nuanced understanding of vocabulary, structure, & discourse patterns; strategies that are transferable across all aspects of language use.

A practical classroom approach

Drawing on my own classroom teaching experience, one effective way to help students learn & develop this strategy is through structured reading for meaning routines. These routines are designed to be simple, memorable, & repeatable, thereby encouraging students to internalise the process.

A sample routine might include the following steps:

  1. Read the entire text once, without stopping, ignoring unknown vocabulary.
  2. Summarise the text in one or two sentences, then compare with a model summary.
  3. For each paragraph:
    1. Read the paragraph.
    2. Re-read & copy into a notebook 2–5 key words unique to that paragraph that best encapsulate its main idea.
    3. Without referring back to the text, refer only to the copied words to explain the paragraph to a classmate or in writing.
    4. Repeat for the next paragraph.

This process, Read → Think → Explain, requires students to actively process & paraphrase information. Over time, they become more confident in expressing the meaning of texts in their own words. More importantly, students who practise this routine regularly show noticeable improvements in reading comprehension & fluency. In my experience, around six to twelve sessions are often sufficient for students to gain confidence & skill in the technique, especially among those who previously struggled with reading tasks.

Diagnostic & motivational value

Reading for meaning activities can also serve as formative diagnostic assessments. Initial disparities in student performance often reveal differences in underlying reading proficiency, providing teachers with a clearer picture of which learners require additional support. As students improve, the progress becomes self-reinforcing: those who once struggled begin to experience success &, as a result, gain motivation & confidence.

Conditions for success

For reading for meaning strategies to work, certain conditions must be met, chief among them, lexical coverage of at least 95%, i.e. students must understand the vocabulary in a given text with no more than 5 unknown words per 100 words. Without this foundation, meaningful processing may become a demotivating struggle. Thus, vocabulary development must remain a fundamental instructional priority. That is to say, no strategy substitutes for vocabulary knowledge.

Integration with broader learning intentions

Once students are proficient in reading for meaning routines, the benefits extend beyond comprehension. These activities integrate well into broader instructional sequences, preparing students for:

  • Vocabulary learning: Understanding words in context, with co-text, & connecting them with meaning.
  • Genre & register analysis: Identifying how texts are structured & how language choices vary by purpose & audience.
  • Linguistic feature study: Processing, analysing, & practising common patterns, phrases, & grammatical constructions.

With sufficient practice, reading for meaning becomes a default mode. Students learn to process & paraphrase without needing to take notes, much like proficient L1 readers do. This transformation, both cognitive & behavioural, marks a significant step forward in a student’s journey toward language mastery.

Conclusion

Shifting the focus of reading instruction from test preparation to meaning-making is not only more pedagogically sound, it is more authentic. Language is, after all, a medium for conveying thought. When students are trained to engage with texts for what they mean, they not only become better test-takers in the longer-term, but more importantly, they become better thinkers, communicators, & learners.

In a world where surface-level engagement is all too common, teaching students to read for meaning is both a necessary corrective & an empowering strategy. It’s time we made it a core part of language instruction.

Reference

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding (First paperback edition). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/es/academic/subjects/psychology/educational-psychology/learning-generative-activity-eight-learning-strategies-promote-understanding?format=HB&isbn=9781107069916